[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug |
Date: |
19 Oct 2003 07:50:14 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:05:29 -0400
>
> Something can be in a separate manual and be a recommended part of
> Emacs facilities.
I don't think it ever worked in practice (not the recommendation
part--that's easy--but the actual use part). Do you have any
examples?
> We certainly would not document a MIME library in the Emacs Lisp
> manual, because it is useful only for mail readers, and that is too
> specialized.
It is no less specialized than primitives like base64-decode-region.
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, (continued)
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Peter S Galbraith, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Peter S Galbraith, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Satyaki Das, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/18
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/18
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alex Schroeder, 2003/10/19
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/19
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16