[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (elisp)Numbers
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: (elisp)Numbers |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:38:18 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:38:07 -0400
>
> If you say "gcc -S" and look at the code, don't you see the FSQRT
> instruction being followed by tests on bits in the FPU status word,
> followed by the call to `sqrt' from the library?
>
> i don't see that on the x87 code here.
The DJGPP port of GCC 2.95.3 does produce the code I described.
Perhaps on GNU/Linux, the library and/or the kernel somehow do the
equivalent of it, I don't know enough about GCC configuration on that
platform to tell.
> anyway, it does not signal the exception.
> can someone try to debug this?
I'll try if no one else does.
> also, i compile with -O0. should that really open-code sqrt?
I tried that on fencepost (they also have GCC 2.95.4 there), and it
didn't open-code sqrt under -O0.
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, (continued)
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/24
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/25
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/26
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/27
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/27
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Andreas Schwab, 2003/10/27
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/28
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Lars Brinkhoff, 2003/10/28
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/28
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/28
- Re: (elisp)Numbers,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/24