[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:14:11 -0500 |
It used to be true back when doc-strings were dumped into the
executable and memory was scarce.
Exactly. We wrote comments instead of doc strings for internal
functions and variables.
But I believe doc-strings for internal variables and functions are
considered acceptable these days.
That's correct. Nowadays, we may as well make these comments into doc
strings. They are easier to find that way, and it does no harm.
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, (continued)
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/20
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/20
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/11/20
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/20
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/11/26
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/26
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Juri Linkov, 2003/11/27
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/11/27
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Peter S Galbraith, 2003/11/27
Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Kevin Ryde, 2003/11/18