[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes
From: |
Per Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:06:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:
> But, first of all, do we want to do (1) or (2)?
I'd vote (0): if there is no group specified, don't put it in any
group.
The option may very well end up in a group anyway (explicit call to
custom-add-to-group or the second argument to defgroup), but if it
doesn't don't worry about it. Having options that aren't in any group
doesn't break anything, and we have already spend way to much energy
on this non-problem.
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, (continued)
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/11/27
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/28
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/11/29
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/11/29
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/11/29
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/11/29
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes,
Per Abrahamsen <=
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/11/30
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/30
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/11/30
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/30
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/11/30
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/30
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/11/30
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/30
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/30
- Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/11/27