[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Info enhancements
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: Info enhancements |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:27:13 -0500 |
For example, currently the Glossary node of the
Emacs Manual has non-functional references that merely has a form of a
simple text "(q.v.)" or "See `default.'".
I see. Yes, this is more or less what anchors were invented for. As
far as glossary entries go, I think that would work ok.
The reference name solution seems too heuristic.
However, I certainly agree with the comment that if we make an anchor
for every index entry, that's too many anchors (it would make the i cmd
a subset of g :). Instead, I think indexes are important enough that
they deserve special treatment.
In fact, we've had this discussion before, in the context of allowing
arbitrary index names (specifically, ones with a :). One message from
that thread is from rms, on 26 Jun 2003 01:30:50 -0400, Message-Id:
<address@hidden>.
If we mark index menus with a special tag, then we can also easily the
exact character or line position within the node for the index entry. I
believe Dave Gillespie (that's my memory, might have been someone else)
implemented a hack for this at one point, but it never made it back
into info.el.
- Re: Info enhancements, (continued)
- Re: Info enhancements, Kim F. Storm, 2003/12/02
- Re: Info enhancements, Juri Linkov, 2003/12/11
- Re: Info enhancements, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/14
- Re: Info enhancements, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/15
- Re: Info enhancements, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/15
- Re: Info enhancements, Juri Linkov, 2003/12/15
- Re: Info enhancements, Kim F. Storm, 2003/12/16
- Re: Info enhancements, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/16
- Re: Info enhancements, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/16
Re: Info enhancements,
Karl Berry <=
Re: Info enhancements, Karl Berry, 2003/12/03