[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the problem?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: What's the problem? |
Date: |
14 Dec 2003 16:27:15 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: 14 Dec 2003 12:55:48 +0100
>
> It can't catch up with a state of Emacs that Emacs has not yet
> reached at the time of the click. At the time posn-point is called,
> the state of Emacs might be quite different from the state at the
> time of the click.
Yes, but if redisplay runs ``in parallel'' with the rest of Emacs, the
probability of this should be smaller, I think, since it will lag
behind Emacs by a smaller amount of changes to the buffer.
- Re: What's the problem?, (continued)
- Re: What's the problem?, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/13
- Emacs kill buffer, Camm Maguire, 2003/12/14
- Re: What's the problem?, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/11
- Re: What's the problem?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/11
- Re: What's the problem?, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/12
- Re: What's the problem?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/13
- Re: What's the problem?, Jan D., 2003/12/13
- Re: What's the problem?, David Kastrup, 2003/12/13
- Re: What's the problem?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/14
- Re: What's the problem?, David Kastrup, 2003/12/14
- Re: What's the problem?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: What's the problem?, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/14
- Re: What's the problem?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/10
- Re: What's the problem?, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/11
- Re: What's the problem?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/12/11
- Re: What's the problem?, Luke A. Olbrish, 2003/12/11
- Re: What's the problem?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/12
- Re: What's the problem?, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/13
- Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/12/05
- Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/12/05
- Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/12/05