[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EMACS and valgrind
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: EMACS and valgrind |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 22:07:44 +0000 |
> Now, I have no idea whether the problem you se without USE_LSB_TAG is due to
> the fact that valgrind uses a malloc implementation that returns pointers
> whose value is larger than 2^29, but it seemed like a possible cause.
It looks like USE_LSB_TAG has moved the problem from a lisp one to one of
memory allocation. As Eli has said earlier, the valgrind team have noted that
memory debugging doesn't work with Emacs:
doc> Programs which are known not to work are:
doc> * emacs starts up but immediately concludes it is out of memory and
doc> aborts. Emacs has it's own memory-management scheme, but I don't
doc> understand why this should interact so badly with Valgrind. Emacs
doc> works fine if you build it to use the standard malloc/free routines.
So I guess its not a simple problem.
Nick
- Re: command and doco for valgrind, (continued)
- Re: command and doco for valgrind, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/19
- Re: command and doco for valgrind, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/18
- Re: command and doco for valgrind, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/18
- Re: command and doco for valgrind, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/19
- Re: command and doco for valgrind, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/19
- Re: command and doco for valgrind, Nick Roberts, 2004/01/19
- Re: EMACS and valgrind (was: command and doco for valgrind), Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/20
- Re: EMACS and valgrind (was: command and doco for valgrind), Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/20
- Re: EMACS and valgrind, Nick Roberts, 2004/01/22
- Re: EMACS and valgrind, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/22
- Re: EMACS and valgrind,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: EMACS and valgrind, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/24