[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with latest CVS.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Problems with latest CVS. |
Date: |
17 Feb 2004 08:43:54 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:49:18 -0600 (CST)
> From: Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden>
>
> 1. `global-auto-revert-non-file-buffers' was ignored for dired
> buffers. I already committed a fix to CVS for that one, because
> that one seemed to be the urgent one:
> `global-auto-revert-non-file-buffers' is a hyper-new option whose
> default value is nil.
>
> 2. To determine whether a dired buffer has changed,
> `auto-revert-dired-changed-p' just counts the number of files in
> the dired buffer and compares it with the number of files listed
> by (directory-files dired-directory). This is completely
> unreliable because of dired-listing-switches, because of inserted
> subdirectories, and probably because of other reasons as well.
>
> I did not fix the second problem.
At Richard's request, I installed yesterday several changes in
autorevert.el, perhaps some of them cause these problems.
- Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/16
- Re: Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/16
- Re: Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/16
- Re: Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/16
- Re: Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/16
- Re: Problems with latest CVS.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/17
- Re: Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/17
- Re: Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/17
- Re: Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/17
- Re: Problems with latest CVS., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/02/17
Re: Problems with latest CVS., Kim F. Storm, 2004/02/16