[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Several suggestions for image support
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Several suggestions for image support |
Date: |
29 Apr 2004 02:29:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> The line distance is determined differently: it is constant for a
> frame unless that would cause overlapping rows with the actual glyph
> dimensions, or unless we change it with special properties on the
> newline characters. Those special properties can also be put on space
> and other characters but have no effect there.
>
> At least that's how I understood the last proposals. It means that if
> one wants to have a paragraph with smaller line distance, one can
> explicitly cover it with an appropriate property.
With my latest changes, emacs has two properties on newlines:
* line-height which gives the minimum line height;
default minimum line height is given by the height of the face
of the newline character.
The actual line height is determined by the text on the line;
if some glyphs are taller than the minimum line height, the
actual line height is increased.
* line-spacing which adds additional pixels between this line and the
next line. Default is the value of the line-spacing variable
(usually 0).
So there is still no "fixed line-distance" concept in emacs, as lines can
always be taller than the ordinary line-distance.
BTW, the line-height and line-spacing properties are currently only
supported as text-properties; should this be extended to check for
overlays too?
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, (continued)
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/24
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Miles Bader, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/27
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/27
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/27
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/29
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/29
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/29
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/25
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/29