[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:14:37 -0500 |
> Type-break mode with fixed-length periods between breaks could use
> such a function to prompt the user to take a break. That way if the
> user returns to the machine after an extended period away, then any
> prompting will, correctly, be gone.
>
> Would we want type-break mode to use a dialog box?
The same situation would then be a case for the dialog box to time
out. Using a dialog box would require an alternative for terminal
display.
We're failing to communicate. The question is whether this is
a real example of wanting to use a dialog box.
Do we really want type-break to use a dialog box?
Does type-break now use a dialog box?
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, (continued)
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Alex Schroeder, 2004/11/06
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Stefan, 2004/11/08
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/09
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/09
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/10
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Jan D., 2004/11/11
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/12
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Matthew Mundell, 2004/11/08
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Jan D., 2004/11/06