[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el
From: |
JD Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:14:31 -0700 |
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 18:00, Miles Bader wrote:
> JD Smith <address@hidden> writes:
> > Thanks Miles. I've looked at it closer, and as expected everything was
> > up to date in idlwave.el with the changes made since my last submission
> > of 2002-09-12 (except the arch-tag and superfluous CVS tags, of
> > course). I suppose there is no arch-friendly $Date$ equivalent?
>
> Arch doesn't care one way or the other about $Date$ -- which is the
> problem: RCS keywords a big pain _unless_ they're treated specially (of
> course CVS does treat them specially).
>
> Is there a reason you can't apply these changes (arch tags and RCS
> keywords) to your sources too?
Adding the arch tag is easy (and done). I tend to use $Date$ myself,
but can trim that when submitting to you guys easily enough. Is there a
recommendation on assoc-ignore-case?
Thanks,
JD
- Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el, Miles Bader, 2004/11/17
- Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el, Miles Bader, 2004/11/17
- Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el, JD Smith, 2004/11/17
- Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/17
- Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el, Miles Bader, 2004/11/17
- Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el,
JD Smith <=
- Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/17
- Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el, JD Smith, 2004/11/18
- Re: Changes to lisp/progmodes/idlw-*.el, JD Smith, 2004/11/17