[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texinfo.tex change.
From: |
Lute Kamstra |
Subject: |
Re: texinfo.tex change. |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:44:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lute Kamstra <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> We could update man/texinfo.tex (and lispref/texinfo.tex and
> lispintro/texinfo.tex) to version 4.8 which defines @LaTeX.
There is no lispref/texinfo.tex. Don't we provide texinfo.tex so that
a user that doesn't have Texinfo installed can do something like "tex
emacs.texi" in the man directory to build the Emacs manual? If so,
shouldn't we also provide lispref/texinfo.tex to enable that user to
build the Lisp manual in the same way?
Lute.
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Kim F. Storm, 2005/02/08
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Lute Kamstra, 2005/02/08
- Re: texinfo.tex change.,
Lute Kamstra <=
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Jay Belanger, 2005/02/08
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Kim F. Storm, 2005/02/09
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Lute Kamstra, 2005/02/09
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Jay Belanger, 2005/02/09
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Eli Zaretskii, 2005/02/10
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Jay Belanger, 2005/02/10
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Eli Zaretskii, 2005/02/11
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Robert J. Chassell, 2005/02/10
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Jay Belanger, 2005/02/10
- Re: texinfo.tex change., Richard Stallman, 2005/02/10