Re: Unicode branch version updates

[Oliver Scholz]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
>> Thank you for taking care of this matter.  But, I vaguely remember
>> that the reason I changed ChangeLog.unicode (I was using it when I was
>> working on it locally) to ChangeLog.22 was that if the extention of
>> ChangeLog file is not digits, something wrong happened.  I'm not sure
>> now.
[...]
> I use such "non-numeric ChangeLog extensions" -- e.g., in my example
> code you quoted, "ChangeLog.tiling" -- regularly for my other branches
> with no obvious problems.
>
> If there is a subtle bug I haven't noticed with such ChangeLogs, we
> should fix that bug.  The fact that you originally used the ".unicode"
> extension originally confirms that it's at least the "natural" name.  :-)
[...]

ISTR that extensions with more than three letters are problematic on
MS DOS (and maybe MS Windows? no idea). How about "Changelog.ucs"?

    Oliver
-- 
Oliver Scholz               26 Pluviôse an 213 de la Révolution
Ostendstr. 61               Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité!
60314 Frankfurt a. M.