[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan...
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan... |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Mar 2005 05:58:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
With -fno-crossjumping, the real assert came to light.
It is xdisp.c in line 6122:
/* The function move_it_vertically_backward may move over more
than the specified y-distance. If it->w is small, e.g. a
mini-buffer window, we may end up in front of the window's
display area. Start displaying at the start of the line
containing PT in this case. */
if (it.current_y <= 0)
{
init_iterator (&it, w, PT, PT_BYTE, NULL, DEFAULT_FACE_ID);
move_it_vertically_backward (&it, 0);
xassert (IT_CHARPOS (it) <= PT);
it.current_y = 0;
}
I suppose that the reseat_1 in move_it_vertically_backward will move
forward again. Something like that.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan...,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/01
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/01
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., David Kastrup, 2005/03/01
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Miles Bader, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., David Kastrup, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Miles Bader, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., David Kastrup, 2005/03/02