[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:40:04 +0000 (UTC) |
In today's GNU Emacs CVS snapshot, Wed, 2005 Mar 2 11:50 UTC
GNU Emacs 22.0.50.13 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.6.2)
started with
/usr/local/src/emacs/src/emacs -Q
M-o is undefined;
C-x C-g is undefined;
C-x g runs the command insert-register-compatibility-binding.
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote
FWIW, I fail to see why people want goto-line, I never used it, ...
This is yet another example of how people are different. I use
goto-line frequently and cannot see working without it. Fifteen or
eighteen years ago I bound it to C-c C-g and have used that binding
ever since.
There are a great many different actions people want to do, and not
that many keybindings.
This suggests that if goto-line is bound to a key chord by default, it
perhaps should be bound to a potentially less used key chord than to a
potentially more used key chord.
--
Robert J. Chassell
address@hidden GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/03/01
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line,
Robert J. Chassell <=
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2005/03/01
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/01
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Kai Großjohann, 2005/03/02
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.emacs, 2005/03/02