[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:29:12 -0500 |
Is there no hope to see the 'facemenu-keymap moved to another key and have
the goto-line solely for M-g?
What other key do you suggest? M-o would be ok, if people want.
If we go that lane, it will more probably
require opening a modifier like "super" or "alt" for it. Most
keyboards by now readily have enough modifiers available.
I don't think that is true. Most keyboards that I have seen have only
CTRL, META and SHIFT.
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Josh Varner, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Reiner Steib, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Johan Bockgård, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Gaetan Leurent, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2005/03/02
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Jari Aalto, 2005/03/02
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Jari Aalto, 2005/03/03
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/03/10