[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line
From: |
Romain Francoise |
Subject: |
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:41:38 +0100 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I would rather put this aside until after the release.
I was hoping we could at least add the "candidates" from my list before
the release. New bindings for previous-error and next-error would be
immediately useful and everyone involved in the discussion so far seemed
to agree.
> I would like a small group to organize to make a plan for what to do
> with M-g, and discuss the question outside of this list. Would those
> who want to do this please do so?
We can just postpone this discussion to after the release.
--
Romain Francoise <address@hidden> | How long will it be before he
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | sees you own his legs but his
| mind is free?
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, (continued)
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Romain Francoise, 2005/03/18
Re: M-g suffixes. Was: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/18
Re: M-g suffixes. Was: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Gaetan Leurent, 2005/03/18
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/18
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2005/03/19
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line,
Romain Francoise <=
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/20