[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible change to startup.el
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Possible change to startup.el |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 07:23:56 +0900 |
On Apr 1, 2005 1:15 AM, Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Why? It's still just as clunky no matter what you call it.
> A period (or whatever) is a pointlessly awkward delimiter.
>
> whether or not it is clunky, the longer phrase is more accurate
> in describing the algorithm (and its one parameter) desired.
Instead of contorting the description, why not just use
`forward-sentence', which will handle more languages correctly than a
simple search for a period? [Perhaps binding
`sentence-end-double-space' to nil to be more forgiving.]
> I am tickled by the concept of a pointless period.
No doubt.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Re: Possible change to startup.el, (continued)
Re: Possible change to startup.el, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/31
Re: Possible change to startup.el, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/31
Re: Possible change to startup.el, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/03/31
Re: Possible change to startup.el, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/31
Re: Possible change to startup.el, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/03/31
Re: Possible change to startup.el, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/31