[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist. |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:57:15 -0400 |
I guess it can't hurt to leave a function on a hook or in
auto-mode-alist if it is replaced by a restored autoload. (Even if
feature x actually put it there.) See patch below. Erring on the
other side seems more damaging: removing a function from a hook when
that function was put there by a user's init file or something.
Usually when a package defines a function and puts it on hooks, that
function will not be autoloaded. If the function is autoloaded, that
means it is meant to be used when the package is not loaded. So that
function might be put on hooks by users before the package is loaded.
So I think what you're proposing is the right criterion.
It would be right most of the time.
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., (continued)
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/24
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., David Kastrup, 2005/04/24
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/24
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., David Kastrup, 2005/04/24
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., Richard Stallman, 2005/04/26
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/20
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/19
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., Andreas Schwab, 2005/04/19
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., David Kastrup, 2005/04/20
Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist., Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/19
- Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist.,
Richard Stallman <=