[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Amendments in calc-units.el
From: |
Jay Belanger |
Subject: |
Re: Amendments in calc-units.el |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:41:18 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> 2005/10/16, Torsten Bronger <address@hidden>:
>> Secondly, "point" should be renamed "bp" (big point). It's not
>> *the* point after all (but an invention by Adobe, as far as I know).
>
> I suspect more calc users use postscript points than "real points"...
I don't have a strong opinion on this, but would using "point" for
PostScript point be less accurate? Also, using "point" for point (of
whatever kind) and "tpt" for TeX point lacks symmetry; perhaps
"texpoint" for TeX point would be better.
Jay
Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, Miles Bader, 2005/10/15
- Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, David Kastrup, 2005/10/16
- Re: Amendments in calc-units.el,
Jay Belanger <=
- Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, Miles Bader, 2005/10/18
- Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, Jay Belanger, 2005/10/18
- Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, David Kastrup, 2005/10/18
- Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/19
- Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/19
Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, David Kastrup, 2005/10/18
Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, Miles Bader, 2005/10/18
Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, David Kastrup, 2005/10/18
Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, Jay Belanger, 2005/10/19
Re: Amendments in calc-units.el, Jay Belanger, 2005/10/19