[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: image size limit?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: image size limit? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:27:49 +0900 |
2005/10/18, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
> My Emacs frames are typically 80 columns of 13x6, i.e. about 500 pixel wide,
> but I often (at least once a week) watch digital photos in those frames
> and more often than not those picteures are 1600 or 2048 pixel wide.
Yeah, me too -- in many cases I just wanna check do a quick check, and
seeing just the upper-left corner is good enough, so I do this with
pictures up to about 3840 x 3072 pixels (that's triple my display
size in each dimension). Emacs scrolling actually works reasonably
well if you only care about the left edge... :-)
I think it's a good idea to have a limit, just make it rather bigger
than any common picture size, e.g., 10,000 x 10,000. Limiting it to
some multiple of the display size seems like pointless extra work --
Emacs on a modern machine is quite capable of handling even pretty big
pictures, it's just the _insane_ sizes from corrupted or malicious
data that cause problems.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Re: image size limit?, (continued)
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/17
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/17
- Re: image size limit?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/18
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, David Kastrup, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/20
- Re: image size limit?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/19