[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: File modes facilities.
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: File modes facilities. |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:29:03 -0400 |
Here is a new patch which fully supports command aliases, optionally
with different interactive specs:
As already explained, that's not the direction I think we should go.
It is not clean for interactive specs to be separated in the sources
from the rest of the function definition.
- Re: File modes facilities., (continued)
- Re: File modes facilities., Michael Cadilhac, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/24
- Re: File modes facilities., David Kastrup, 2005/10/24
- Re: File modes facilities., Andreas Schwab, 2005/10/24
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/24
- Re: File modes facilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/24
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/24
- Re: File modes facilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/24
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/25
- Re: File modes facilities.,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/25
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/25
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/26
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/26
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/26
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/21
- Re: File modes facilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/21