RE: C-x C-f RET change

[Drew Adams]

    >     > I use pop-up-frames = t. Each buffer is in its own frame, by
    >     > default. So, I use `C-x 4 f' to open the same file in another
    >     > frame (cloning the frame, in effect).
    >
    >     What's wrong with `C-x 5 2'?
    >
    > Nothing.  Good point.
    >
    > I guess I never think of the `C-x 5' prefix, because I use
    > pop-up-frames = t. `C-x 4' generally does the same thing as
    > `C-x 5' in that case, except for a few exceptions like this
    > (there is no `C-x 4 2').

    There is C-x 2 though.

I guess I miss your point.  Even with pop-up-frames = t, `C-x 2' does not
open the file in a separate frame (and it shouldn't).