[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple debugging sessions
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple debugging sessions |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:22:09 +0200 |
> From: "Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:41:01 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Everyone, could we please stop this argument? It is not constructive.
> Nick already knows it would be desirable to support multiple GDB
> processes in one Emacs process. Now is the wrong time for such a
> rewrite. There is nothing here to discuss.
Indeed. And on top of that, the attitude is extremely unkind to Nick.
I think Nick did a very good job[1] by introducing a feature that was
awaiting a volunteer for years (and continually contributes to GDB on
related issues).
In any case, bashing a volunteer for donating useful code is a bad
mantra; if someone thinks the code isn't good enough, they are free to
do better.
[1] I know people with a generally anti-Emacs orientation who, after
being shown "M-x gdba", told me that this single feature might
convince them to start using Emacs.
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, (continued)
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Miles Bader, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Miles Bader, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Kim F. Storm, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/10
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, Kim F. Storm, 2005/11/11
- Re: Multiple debugging sessions, David Kastrup, 2005/11/11