[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:03:33 -0400 |
I will rewrite the doc string. Thanks.
All in all, I think it'd be useful to have a FEATURE-unload-function
which would return t or nil to signal whether it has done everything,
or would like for unload-feature to continue with its normal
processing.
The idea makes sense, but it would be an incompatible change. A
compatible change with a similar effect is to move the usual
processing into a separate function which the hook can call.
Want to do that?
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, (continued)
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Davis Herring, 2007/10/23
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/24
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Davis Herring, 2007/10/11
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, David Kastrup, 2007/10/25
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/28
Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts,
Richard Stallman <=