[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: State of VC?
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: State of VC? |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:21:40 -0800 |
Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> This is not the same if a marked file changes from modified to
unmodified.
> >> In this case it will disappear from the listing.
>
> Dan> OK. Would this need a change in the interface to the backend?
>
> I don't think so. Maybe it would be nice to have a function that is
> called to indicate that the update is complete... that's come up a
> couple times.
That seems to be necessary only when doing partial updates. Now the
update is complete when vc-update-vc-status-buffer gets called.
But maybe first we should wait for ESR to post his plan/roadmap before
doing any further changes. Hopefully this will happen soon ...
- Re: State of VC?, (continued)
- Re: State of VC?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/25
- Re: State of VC?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/25
- Re: State of VC?, Alexandru Harsanyi, 2008/01/26
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?, Tom Tromey, 2008/01/22
- Re: State of VC?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/22
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/23
- Re: State of VC?, Tom Tromey, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: State of VC?, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/26