[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces
|
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
|
Subject: |
Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces |
|
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:29:28 +0900 |
|
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, James Cloos <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> The complication, of course, is when multiple font backends are in use.
> I run with just xft. If you have x,xft then it is probably right for
> the Helvetica bitmap to win out. If xft,x then that might be debatable:
> whether 'tis better to give primary weight to the name or to the technology?
FYI, the current font-selection code doesn't pay attention
to the order of font backends.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/07
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/07
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/07
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, David Hansen, 2008/06/07
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, James Cloos, 2008/06/07
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/08
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/08
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/09
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Miles Bader, 2008/06/09
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/09
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Miles Bader, 2008/06/09
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Miles Bader, 2008/06/09
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/09
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Miles Bader, 2008/06/09
- Re: Fixed-pitch and variable-pitch faces, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/09