[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tags for functions
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: tags for functions |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:09:17 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:39:40 -0500 "Stefan Monnier" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Let's go with
>> (defun my-move-defun ()
>> "docstring"
>> :keywords '(move)
>> ...)
SM> How 'bout
SM> (defun my-move-defun ()
SM> "docstring"
SM> (declare (keywords (move)))
SM> ...)
SM> PS: Don't take this to mean I think this is a good idea. I haven't had
SM> time to think about it or even read the thread for that matter.
The CL `declare' macro could be used based on a quick read of the
source, assuming that's what you mean, but the CL docs don't show how it
could be used generally. Should I modify `cl-do-proclaim' to keep track
of the keywords myself when `declare' is called?
It does seem cleaner than :keywords at the defun level.
Ted
- tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/20
- Re: tags for functions, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/21
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/22
- Re: tags for functions, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/24
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/26
- Re: tags for functions, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/26
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/27
- Re: tags for functions, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/27
- Re: tags for functions, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/27
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/28
- Re: tags for functions, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/28