[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this fallout from the end-of-defun changes?
From: |
Tobias C. Rittweiler |
Subject: |
Re: Is this fallout from the end-of-defun changes? |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:53:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" <address@hidden> writes:
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > I'll file a bug report as soon as Stefan confirms that it is one (it
> > > should, it's quite weird to be on a line of function1 and get
> > > function2 evalled).
> >
> > Yes, it's a bug, of course. I believe I've fixed it,
>
> That does not seem to be fixed properly:
>
> 1
>
> 2; point here, then C-M-x
>
> (defun foo () 42)
>
> This evaluates `foo'.
>
> GNU Emacs 23.0.91.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.9) of
> 2009-02-27 on thaleron
This does not seem to be fixed yet. Should I report this as an Emacs bug
explicitly? It's a regression, and I'd like to see this fixed before the
release. (I do use C-M-x on variable names.)
Thanks!
-T.
- Re: Is this fallout from the end-of-defun changes?,
Tobias C. Rittweiler <=