[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: system-type
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: system-type |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:52:57 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:59:46 -0400
>
> >> > The text sounds as if this is exhaustive list, but then what is the
> >> > value defined by the NextSTEP port?
> >> Depends: if it's running under Mac OS X, it'll be `darwin', if it's
> >> running under GNU/Linux it'll be `gnu/linux', ...
> > `darwin' is not in that list. Should it be added?
>
> Yes. It's in the docstring.
>
> > Also, what with all the other Unixoid systems (which I presume we
> > still support), like *BSD, Solaris, etc.?
>
> As the docstring explains: "Anything else indicates some sort of
> Unix system."
I updated the list in os.texi with the currently supported system.
- system-type, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/03/21
- Re: system-type, Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/21
- Re: system-type, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/03/21
- Re: system-type, Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/21
- Re: system-type, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/03/21
- Re: system-type, Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/21
- Re: system-type,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: system-type, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/03/27
- Re: system-type, Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/27