[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:45:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> "consistent" in which sense?
Consistent in time.
> I really can't imagine why "tag" would be a problem. "tag" is suppose
> to tag exactly the revisions of the files you have currently checked
> out, so if those files are fine, so is your tag.
That's exactly the problem. Your checked out files may be out of date
wrt. the repository.
> I can definitely imagine lots of cases where it might be very difficult
> to represent tags properly when translating from CVS to something else,
> regardless of how the tag was applied.
If you tag consistently there won't be any problem.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, (continued)
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, David Kastrup, 2009/12/10
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/12/10
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Steven Knight, 2009/12/09