[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
C-x C-q and undo [was: Bind `q' to `quit-window' or similar in *Messages
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
C-x C-q and undo [was: Bind `q' to `quit-window' or similar in *Messages*] |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:58:00 -0800 |
> I've often felt that C-x C-q should turn on the undo-log when
> making a buffer writeable. It hasn't bothered me enough to actually
> code it up and try it, but maybe people could try it out and see if it
> leads to problems.
I was wondering the same thing.
But maybe the two should not always be coupled.
It's easy enough to enable undo, with command `buffer-enable-undo'. Of course,
that's not bound to a key, by default. (Likewise, disabling.)
The prefix arg for `C-x C-q' is used only to specify on or off explicitly. One
possibility would be to have plain `C-u' toggle read-only and call
`buffer-enable-undo' or `buffer-disable-undo' as appropriate. So:
C-1 C-x C-q would turn read-only ON (and not affect undo)
C- C-x C-q would turn read-only OFF " " " "
C-u C-x C-q would toggle read-only and turn undo on/off accordingly
Even more flexible: We could have an option, `toggle-read-only-affects-undo'. If
non-nil, then `C-x C-q' without `C-u' would affect undo; with `C-u' it would not
affect undo. If nil, the behavior would be reversed: without `C-u' would not
affect undo; with `C-u' it would affect undo.
- Re: Bind `q' to `quit-window' or similar in *Messages*, (continued)