[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commit netiquette.
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Commit netiquette. |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:45:52 -0500 |
revno: 99513
committer: Mark A. Hershberger <address@hidden>
branch nick: local
timestamp: Wed 2010-02-17 16:39:21 -0500
message:
2010-02-17 Mark A. Hershberger <address@hidden>
* vc-bzr.el: fix typo in Known Bugs section.
* isearch.el (isearch-update-post-hook): New hook
(isearch-update): Use the new hook.
modified:
lisp/ChangeLog
lisp/isearch.el
lisp/vc-bzr.el
The Committer used the full Changelog entry as the commit message, so on
interfaces that just shows the first line of the commit (like the
emacs-diffs mailing list or the output of `bzr log --short' or `qlog')
you see
2010-02-17 Mark A. Hershberger <address@hidden>
which is hardly indicative of the change.
This seems more of a short comming in `bzr log --short' than in the
way one writes commit messages. A commit message is more than a
single line. And the purpose of a change is always more suitable in
the actual code as a comment.
Re: Commit netiquette.,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
Re: Commit netiquette., Chong Yidong, 2010/02/20
Re: Commit netiquette., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/02/23
Re: Commit netiquette., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/02/19