[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-selection-mode
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: delete-selection-mode |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:21:05 +0100 |
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Lennart Borgman
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I think some of these problems have been addressed in cua-mode. Maybe
> it would be good to use what is in cua-mode more?
I just found that org-mode failed to support cua-mode. It only
supports shift-select-mode when the option org-support-shift-select is
set.
So the current organisation of this may difficult to support. I
suggest that the support of shift select should be based on that
support in cua-mode. I think that would remove some confusion and make
it easier for both old timers and newcomers. (But the main thing then
is of course that cua-mode does what it is supposed to do.)
- AW: delete-selection-mode, (continued)
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/21
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Miles Bader, 2010/03/21
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Juri Linkov, 2010/03/21
- Re: delete-selection-mode, David Kastrup, 2010/03/22
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/21
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Miles Bader, 2010/03/21
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/22
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/22
- Re: delete-selection-mode,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Miles Bader, 2010/03/23
- Re: delete-selection-mode, David Kastrup, 2010/03/23
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Miles Bader, 2010/03/23
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/23
- Re: delete-selection-mode, David Kastrup, 2010/03/23
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/23
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Juri Linkov, 2010/03/23
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/23
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Juri Linkov, 2010/03/24
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/24