Re: ChangeLog entry for ido.el

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: John Wiegley <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 06:33:00 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> On Apr 4, 2010, at 5:35 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Are long entries such as the one below really appropriate for
> > ChangeLog files?  I don't think ChangeLog is a place to explain how
> > things work; it would have been much better to move this description
> > to ido.el itself, right where ido-use-virtual-buffers is defined.
> 
> I wasn't sure about that, whether it's just to state a change or also add a 
> short justification.  I think your assessment is the more accurate.

The log entry is indeed supposed to give a short summary, but that
summary should be one or two lines.