[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Negative positions in frame parameters
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Negative positions in frame parameters |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:12:07 +0900 |
Lennart Borgman writes:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Stefan Monnier
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Recently
> >
> > (make-frame '((left . -10) (top . -10)))
> >
> > stopped placing the frame in the bottom-right corner of the screen (at
> > least in the Gtk build).
> >
> > Could someone fix it?
>
> Why should it go to the bottom-right corner?
This is just the traditional behavior on X11 displays. Negative
position coordinates are relative to the bottom-right corner, positive
ones to the top-left.
> At least on w32 you can have the upper left corner outside of the
> screen.
You can in X, too, but it's rarely useful for top-level windows. The
ability to place the window on the right or bottom of the screen is
often useful. IME YMMV, of course; I'm just explaining where the
tradition comes from, not advocating it.
- Negative positions in frame parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/13
- Re: Negative positions in frame parameters, Jan Djärv, 2010/04/13
- Re: Negative positions in frame parameters, David Kastrup, 2010/04/13
- Re: Negative positions in frame parameters, Jan Djärv, 2010/04/13
- RE: Negative positions in frame parameters, Drew Adams, 2010/04/13
- Re: Negative positions in frame parameters, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/04/13
- Re: Negative positions in frame parameters, Jan Djärv, 2010/04/14
- Re: Negative positions in frame parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/13