[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FFI
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: FFI |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:52:12 +0200 |
* Stefan Monnier:
>> my interest is to have compatible FFI in GNU Emacs and (S)XEmacs (at
>> least on high level, read lisp level), so two communities could reuse
>> bindings.
>
> That's fine by me. The main problem here is to figure out if and how we
> can support FFIs, not from a technical standpoint but from
> a legal/political standpoint. Until recently RMS's word on it was just
> "no way", but there's hope we can do something like what GCC does.
>
> So, for now, we're just waiting for the word of the FSF's legal
> adviser(s?). Don't hold your breath. But we'll be sure to get in touch
> if/when it turns out we can finally add an FFI.
Uh-oh. SQLite support will bring in some sort of FFI as well, albeit
rather indirectly, so I guess that means it's not possible to add it
until that is settled. 8-(
- Re: FFI, (continued)
- Re: telepathy (was: FFI), Jan Moringen, 2010/04/19
- Re: telepathy, Michael Albinus, 2010/04/20
- Re: telepathy, Jan Moringen, 2010/04/20
- Re: telepathy, Zajcev Evgeny, 2010/04/20
- Re: FFI, joakim, 2010/04/19
- Re: FFI, Zajcev Evgeny, 2010/04/19
- Message not available
- Re: FFI,
Florian Weimer <=
- Re: FFI, Andreas Schwab, 2010/04/19
- Re: Embedding SQLite, Florian Weimer, 2010/04/18
- Re: Embedding SQLite, Leo, 2010/04/18
Message not available
Re: Embedding SQLite, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/04/19