Re: POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd?

[Dan Nicolaescu]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

  > > From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
  > > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:11:31 -0400
  > > 
  > > Besides src/s/gnu.h only w32 does not define POSIX_SIGNALS...
  > 
  > All these signals mean nothing to w32.  AFAICS, we could simply define
  > empty no-ops for the functions Emacs uses under POSIX_SIGNALS, and
  > then w32 would not need any special conditions in these quarters.
  > 
  > Let me know if you want me to make this happen.  (I guess it's only
  > worthwhile when the Hurd issue gets cleared.)

Please do that.  If you add a
#define POSIX_SIGNALS
to the w32 file and take care of the consequences, I'll do a pass later
to remove all references to POSIX_SIGNALS, assuming it is always
defined.

Thanks