Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core

[Leo]

On 2010-09-25 16:23 +0100, Drew Adams wrote:
> Sorry, I don't get it.  What is TEST for?  It is typically for a binary
> predicate such as `equal' - but we already have PREDICATE here.  And just what
> is second class here (if TEST is not added)?

`remove-if' as defined in cl.el can not be used in a package intended to
be included in GNU Emacs due to the use of cl run time functions.

So to move this function into elisp Miles (I think) proposed that we
give up some of its keyword arguments since they mostly are not used and
turned the keyword :test argument into an optional one.

Leo