[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:31:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:26:02 +0800 Jason Rumney <address@hidden> wrote:
JR> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
>> I still think Emacs bugs should be simply reported through a HTTP (REST
>> or whatever) call. That would cover the most users and we can use
>> confirmation e-mails to avoid spamming.
JR> A lot of users are behind a proxy. You still have a configuration
JR> nightmare to deal with.
I think it's much harder to set up sendmail or SMTP. Setting up a web
proxy is hardly a nightmare, and as I said it benefits a wide range of
users. Specifically for submitting *Emacs bugs* it's a good solution.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:37:08 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
wrote:
SJT> Why can't we have both?
I'd love that: sendmail or SMTP for those who want it, and HTTP for
those who need it.
The web form would take some work for the confirmation e-mails, but
surely it would be worth it? Would it help if I put it together?
Ted
- `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/10
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/10
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Jason Rumney, 2012/02/10
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/02/10
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/13
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/13
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/13
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Chong Yidong, 2012/02/14
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Dimitri Fontaine, 2012/02/19
- Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/02/21