Re: inlinable functions instead of macros

[Stefan Monnier]

Could some please check our inlinable functions and move any easserts in
them to a macro (i.e. rename the function, replace the old name with
a macro that does the assert and calls the inlinable function)?

If someone wants to *additionally* provide a patch to use glibc's
`backtrace' in our `eassert' that's fine, but the two are
separate issues.


        Stefan