[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:49:27 -0500 |
Shouldn't an effort then be made to create a software license or
tweak/upgrade an existing one to ensure free software cannot be used in
ways that go against its very philosophy?
We're limited by copyright law and by 28 years of our own history,
so it is not really an option.
I understand your wish to ensure free software remains free not matter
what, but restricting the freedom of users of free software should not
be the solution; in fact this sounds like a contradiction in itself.
Those words are a paradox, and a misrepresentation of what we do.
Copyleft protects users' essential freedoms, for all users, by
restricting acts by X that might deny essential freedoms to Y.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/copyleft.html for an explanation
of copyleft.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, (continued)
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/02
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Helmut Eller, 2012/12/02
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/02
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Burton Samograd, 2012/12/03
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/03
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Miguel Guedes, 2012/12/04
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/05
- Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/02
Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2012/12/02
Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic, David Engster, 2012/12/04