[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA security
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA security |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:34:35 +0900 |
Ted Zlatanov writes:
> 3. we may need a way to revoke a signed commit. Perhaps it can simply
> be a revert of the previously committed "bad" code, followed by another
> commit, instead of a full revocation process.
Branches. It should be possible for a package.el implementation to
call home to the original GNU ELPA and check on the status of the most
recent signed commit.
Re: ELPA security, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/22
- Re: ELPA security, Paul Nathan, 2012/12/26
- Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31
- Re: ELPA security,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security), Nic Ferrier, 2012/12/31
- Re: Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security), Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31
- Re: Package signing infrastructure suggestion (was Re: ELPA security), Xue Fuqiao, 2012/12/31
Re: ELPA security, Tom Tromey, 2012/12/31
RE: ELPA security, Drew Adams, 2012/12/31
Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31
Re: ELPA security, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/31