[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: zlib autoconf question
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: zlib autoconf question |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:05:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> That's similar to what the Windows port does with all the optional
> libraries: the headers are required during the compilation, but the
> libraries are not. They are loaded when needed, with the equivalents
> of dlopen and dlsym.
With an FFI you don't even need the headers. The library could be used
even if it didn't exist back when Emacs was built.
Stefan
- Re: zlib autoconf question, (continued)
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Ulrich Mueller, 2013/08/08
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/11
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Ulrich Mueller, 2013/08/11
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/11
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Ulrich Mueller, 2013/08/11
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/11
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/11
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/12
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/12
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/12
- Re: zlib autoconf question,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/12
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Richard Stallman, 2013/08/12
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/12
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/12
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Dmitry Antipov, 2013/08/12
- Re: zlib autoconf question, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas, 2013/08/08