[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the state of the concurrency branch
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: the state of the concurrency branch |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:04:46 +0200 |
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> What would it take to merge the branch to trunk?
>
> It sounds like it's close to ready for merge, indeed.
Well, it breaks the Windows build.
gcc -std=gnu99 -c -mtune=pentium4 -Ic:/Devel/emacs/include
-DUSE_CRT_DLL=1 -I /c/Devel/emacs/repo/concurrency/nt/inc -Demacs -I.
-I/c/Devel/emacs/repo/concurrency/src -I../lib
-I/c/Devel/emacs/repo/concurrency/src/../lib -mtune=pentium4
-Ic:/Devel/emacs/build/include/libxml2 -MMD -MF deps/vm-limit.d -MP
-Ic:/Devel/emacs/build/include
-Ic:/Devel/emacs/build/include/p11-kit-1 -O0 -g3 vm-limit.c
In file included from lisp.h:538:0,
from vm-limit.c:21:
thread.h:235:31: error: unknown type name 'SELECT_TYPE'
thread.h:235:46: error: unknown type name 'SELECT_TYPE'
thread.h:235:61: error: unknown type name 'SELECT_TYPE'
thread.h:238:21: error: unknown type name 'select_func'
thread.h:238:53: error: unknown type name 'SELECT_TYPE'
thread.h:239:7: error: unknown type name 'SELECT_TYPE'
thread.h:239:26: error: unknown type name 'SELECT_TYPE'
Makefile:358: recipe for target `vm-limit.o' failed
make[1]: *** [vm-limit.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/Devel/emacs/repo/concurrency/src'
Adding
#ifdef WINDOWSNT
#include "w32.h"
#endif
to thread.h to add the SELECT_TYPE declaration fixes that, but there
are new breakages a little further. So it is not close to ready for
merge.
J
- the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/25
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/26
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Tom Tromey, 2013/08/27
- Re: the state of the concurrency branch, Paul Eggert, 2013/08/27