[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SHA, MD, and openssl
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: SHA, MD, and openssl |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 2013 13:58:56 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 12/13/2013 12:21 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> But SHA1 and SHA256 are commonly available accelerated in hardware.
> For this very small subset of routines should we not consider
> libcrypto as a system library to these hardware specific interfaces.
>
> This has nothing to do with what we "should consider".
> It is a legal criterion stated in the GPL.
OK.
Note I've changed coreutils not automatically
use these routines where available.
thanks,
Pádraig.
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, (continued)
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/10
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Paul Eggert, 2013/12/10
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Paul Eggert, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Pádraig Brady, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Glenn Morris, 2013/12/11
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/12/12
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/12
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Pádraig Brady, 2013/12/12
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/13
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl,
Pádraig Brady <=
- Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Richard Stallman, 2013/12/13
Re: SHA, MD, and openssl, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2013/12/09