[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:53:18 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> We have a list for such discussion: gnu-misc-discuss.
> Please take it there, and stop raising it here.
Excuse me for the correction, but I didn't raise it. You did.
"It" means attacking the GNU Project's general positions, policies,
goals, etc.
I made the point that there is a wide variety of packages and
development organizations participating in GNU, many of which are
otherwise independent of GNU, in the context of the question "isn't
GNU inconsistent when Emacs requires assignments but many other GNU
projects don't?"
Yes, you did -- as an argument against a GNU Project position.
Earlier I explained why the argument was invalid. Now the point
is that such arguments do not belong on this list.
We have a list for that sort of discussion: gnu-misc-discuss.
Please take it there.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp,
Richard Stallman <=