[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: One more string functions change
From: |
Dmitry Antipov |
Subject: |
Re: One more string functions change |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:32:44 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
On 06/28/2014 05:48 PM, Drew Adams wrote:
Value of case-fold-search doesn't affect string-lessp and string-equal.
Oh, right. What was the reason for that? Anyone know?
Someone was too lazy or just didn't consider this important
enough - who knows?
or: (string-lessp (upper s1) (upper s2))
To me, that cliche seems just as easy & clear as (string-lessp s1 s2 t).
Sure, but if we treat strings as immutable objects, both 'upper' should
create copies; the latter can avoid memory allocation at all and so
disprove the well-known "LISP programmers know the value of everything
and the cost of nothing" principle.
Dmitry
- Re: One more string functions change, (continued)
- Re: One more string functions change, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/28
- Re: One more string functions change, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/28
- Re: One more string functions change, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/29
- Re: One more string functions change, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/29
- Re: One more string functions change, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/29
- Internationalize Emacs's messages [Was: Re: One more string functions change], Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/30
- Re: One more string functions change, Yuri Khan, 2014/06/28
RE: One more string functions change, Drew Adams, 2014/06/27