[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:27:10 +0300 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Cc: Mike Gerwitz <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:50:37 +0900
>
> In the case of Emacs coding systems, it's as simple as choosing to
> name the conformant coding system 'utf-8, and the non-conformant one
> 'utf-8-with-rawbytes.
We already tried something akin to that, and the users almost
unanimously wanted Emacs to opt-in by default.
> Why does this excite such <adjective deleted> opposition?
Because we've been-there-done-that, and have enough gray hair to prove
that what you are asking will be met with staunch user opposition.
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/10
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/10
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/10