[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 05:35:10 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:19:15 +0100
>
> > How about applying to both (with a suitable "don't merge to trunk"
> > note on emacs-24)?
>
> Not sure how to do that on an effective way.
I didn't mean anything fancy, just to apply to each branch separately,
resolving problems, if any.
> Pushed the change to emacs-24. Let's see how it fares after the next
> merge.
Thank you.
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Glenn Morris, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/18
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Paul Eggert, 2014/11/17
- Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/11/16
Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17